When comparing Papaly vs Bitwarden, the Slant community recommends Papaly for most people. In the question“What are the best new tab extensions for Chrome?” Papaly is ranked 2nd while Bitwarden is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose Papaly is:
You can organize your bookmarks however you want.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Easily customizable
You can organize your bookmarks however you want.
Pro Great bookmark resource
Simple and well designed bookmarklet with a lot of useful features.
Pro Cross platform
Pro Open source
Bitwarden is open source and can therefore easily be reviewed and checked for security. Its Github repository is accessible here: https://github.com/bitwarden.
It is easy to start as the majority of features are on the free version.
Pro Cross-platform syncronisation
Automatically synchronises across various devices and platforms. Passwords get fully encrypted locally before leaving the computer.
Pro Many browser plugins
There are plugins for Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, Edge, Vivaldi and Tor Browser.
Pro Clean interface with no ads
Pro Native mobile apps for iOS and Android
Pro Two-step authentication
Offers 2FA with Authy, Google Authenticator or via email.
Additionally, the Pro Version has Duo Security with Duo Push, SMS, phone call, and U2F security keys: YubiKey (any 4 series device or YubiKey NEO) and FIDO U2F (any FIDO U2F certified key).
Pro Extremely strong encryption algorithm
End-to-end AES-256 bit encryption, salted hashing, and PBKDF2 SHA-256.
Pro Strong, easy to use built-in password genarator
No need to think of individual passwords. This can be easily accomplished with an easy to use built-in password manager.
Pro Web vault
Possibility to manage passwords without installing the app or the browser plugin.
Pro Multifactor authentication
Pro Supports multi-logins on one site
You can store multiple logins on the same website.
Pro Auto-fill remembers last user
When a site has multiple credentials (like I have for some brokers and banks), then the most recently used is automatically populated (if auto-fill is opted). This feature is unique (to my knowledge) and spectacular (especially for sites that log you off frequently and re-logging in is required).
Pro Secure notes
Very easy to add personal notes.
Pro Self-host your own server
Host your own server via Docker for small installations or by package for multiple servers.
Pro Command line interface
You could retrieve passwords in the scripts.
Pro Dark theme
Pro Easy import/export
Just copy CSV text.
Pro Digital unlock works fairly well
Android app is a little slow and buggy, but it works well and has been improving.
Pro Regular expressions can be used in URIs
It can also be used for sites where the domain changes frequently.
Pro Almost complete free version
The features included in the free version are totally sufficient for most personal uses. No limitation of devices synching.
Pro Save data on the web
Save data on the web.
Pro Enterprise ready
Using enterprise subscribtions you can share password entries among your colleagues via 'collections' or with other companies that are connected to yours. You decide if it's your personal entry or a companies.
Pro Nested folders
Folders can be created within folders.
Pro Use hardware based biometrics to unlock Bitwarden
You can use Windows Hello or Apple's TouchID on PC to unlock desktop applications and browser extention.
Pro Auto-fill by specifying the form with the selector of css
Auto-fill by specifying the form with the selector of css.
Con So far impossible to delete account
Menus only give option to deactivate, not delete account. Can't log into helpdesk with main account credentials (as it says you should), so no way of tracking submitted ticket. Deleting account should not require helpdesk input.
Con It is slow on Chrome web browser
A new tab opens slower than on others.
Con No Android App
Con Password generator only uses 8 special characters !@#$%^&*
Where as a desktop keyboard has 30+ special characters. This greatly reduces the possible passwords that can be generated.
Con Cannot update data while offline
Requires Internet connection.
You're storing your passwords on servers and you have to trust them.
Con Unable to remove duplicates
If you import more than one times, it will store its duplicates and there is no duplicate remover on these apps.
Con Input of new login needs a 'signed-up with e-mail = 'email@example.com' functionality
Often sites won't be able to reset your password if the corresponding e-mail used in sign-up is unknown.
Con Passwords cards can be tricky for newbies
The fields can be difficult to understand for newbies. For example, some login pages can add a field for the password name differently at the same time as the password's field will contain a password. When changing the password, they sometime end corresponding and can give headaches to some users.
Con Lack of communication between instance opened in one session
If you use the client's desktop's app, multiple browsers extensions; they all work almost totally independently. Using more RAM as database is opened each time and asking for login more often. Some other passwords managers use desktop's client to open the database and extensions communicate with it in this case. If there's no desktop's, they'll work as standalone extensions.
Con Saving new credentials isn't as easy as it should be
When registering on a new site, Bitwarden pops up a button to ask if you'd like to save credentials (as most equivalent products do). But the button disappears VERY quickly, so often requires manual entry of passwords
Con The autofill sucks
The autofill is tedious - many clicks/taps required to trigger it. It doesn't help that the extension is slow to open.
Con Cannot store images of ID card, etc
Attachments available in premium.
Con Web browser extension doesn't recognise login required
User has to scroll/search for web site login details as it is not found automatically.