When comparing Discord vs Disa, the Slant community recommends Discord for most people. In the question“What are the best messaging apps for Android?” Discord is ranked 13th while Disa is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Discord is:
Discord follows the same type of interface design popularised by Slack, which is extremely clean and attractive, and doesn't clutter the interface with unnecessary chrome and cruft.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro User friendly
Discord follows the same type of interface design popularised by Slack, which is extremely clean and attractive, and doesn't clutter the interface with unnecessary chrome and cruft.
Pro Free for unlimited users
Unlimited amount of users.
Pro Can be used in browser
Users can invite others to join a Discord channel via a web link, which means no installation is required to use the software - which is one of the big typical barriers to entry for social software.
Pro Good 1-click invite system
Discord allows inviting people to a specific channel with a link. Links can be set to expire. Low effort/passive invite mechanics.
Pro Easy setup
You can quickly send invites to people and they can join in using the web client without having to create an account or install the app.
Pro Has low-latency VoIP support
Pro Supports video and text communication
Behaves and looks like Slack for regular text channels, but with the ability to create voice channels as well
Pro Numerous controls for setting member roles.
Deny access, Deny write message, Allow read messages etc.
Pro Ability to create bots
Discord provides an API for creating custom bots.
Pro Open source bots and management tools
Discord has a wide variety of bots for things from airhorn noises to automated server management, to leveling systems for chat. The bot API is open and there are dedicated sites for finding bots.
Pro Game integration
Discord shows which game each user is currently playing, which among other things helps users to form PUGs with minimal hassle.
Pro Dark theme out of the box
Pro Familiar for Slack users
For those that are used to the way Slack (a similar chat client) works, Discord will be familiar in its use, which lowers the learning curve quite a bit for those that have switched or tried Slack before.
Pro Low effort invite mechanics
Pro Android app has push notifications
Pro Syntax highlighting and Markdown support
The support is limited but still exists. It's a killer feature for dev teams.
Pro DDoS mitigation
Discord prevents users from being DDoSed out of games.
Pro Targeting of roles
Targeting roles allows for quickly requesting someone from a group e.g. artist, moderator, etc.
Pro Ability to thread channels
Ability to create channel categories for channels to sit inside of.
Pro Friendly payment policy
Free account have no tangible restrictions.
Premium account is just a way to say "thank you" to developers. And it work for all servers of discord (not as in slack). And it can be purchased by one who wants. In contrast to Slask, where all active members of the server should be "premium".
Pro Language localization
Have localization for many language, including Russian.
Pro Does not allow NSFW related things to be posted unless in a NSFW channel
Pro Does what it's supposed to do, without bloatware
Pro Open source plugin API
Everyone can develop their own plug-ins.
Pro Easy to use
Disa is very easy to use and has an open source API, so many new services will be added soon.
Pro Customizable notifications
Ability to set different notification sound/vibration/led based on the plugin.
Pro Unified conversations
Ability to merge conversations from the same contact on different services.
Pro Friendly developers and generally good G+ community
Fast, decent replies to questions, even if they've been asked before.
Pro Many requested features
The developer team does actually listen to the community and adds requested features.
Pro Pushbullet support
Disa works great with Pushbullet, allowing you to answer from your PC.
Pro Many languages
Help and support in many languages.
Pro Disa takes privacy much more serious
Currently, the Disa team knows less about you than the website you're currently visiting.
Pro Great material design
With color-changing design with custom colors for each service.
Cons
Con Proprietary software
Discord is closed-source, meaning their code isn't available for inspection or reproduction
Con Based on Electron = eats a lot of ram
Con Some functions cut out and available only with "Nitro" subscription
Con Developer's previous company was sued for privacy violations, among other things
See:
http://classactionlawsuitsinthenews.com/class-action-lawsuit-complaints/openfeint-green-international-privacy-class-action-lawsuit-complaint/
https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/closing-letters/openfeint-inc
Discord's privacy policy also states that while they might not sell your data, a company they get sold to will quite possibly attain said data and thus may be in "more" shady hands.
Con No self-hosting avaliable
Discord is wholly hosted by Discord (the company), you cannot run private instances, and all servers are hosted on their infrastructure. For most people, this won't really impact their usage.
Con Not a generic "team chat" tool
All the UI and the features are aimed specifically at communicating with your gaming team/clan.
Con Very unstable on Linux
Con Anti-privacy license terms
Con Can change "Now Playing" status to something inappropriate
Con Doesn't support most messaging apps
Con Disa doesn't follow the Google Design Guidelines
Hamburger Menu/Navigation Drawer (Side Menu):
https://www.google.com/design/spec/patterns/navigation-drawer.html#navigation-drawer-contentNo Animations:
Empty Pages/States:
Maybe a Launch screen?:
Con Does not support Google SMS
Con Closed source
Disa is closed source, so the development speed is capped of their team, no external developer can help or add features that are not on the route of the team.
Con Doesn't support WhatsApp at the moment
Con Attaching pictures suddenly failed; no working solution.
Con Smaller development team leading somewhat slow implementation of requested features
Though the main development (framework, etc) is moving along fine, things like quick reply and sending multiple images at once should've been in quicker.