When comparing Flikr vs Snapr, the Slant community recommends Flikr for most people. In the question“What are the best Android apps for sharing photos?” Flikr is ranked 1st while Snapr is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Flikr is:
Photos in the library can be automatically uploaded to Flikr, which enhances the usefulness of the free TB they give all users.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Auto-sync
Photos in the library can be automatically uploaded to Flikr, which enhances the usefulness of the free TB they give all users.
Pro Provides 1TB of free space
Any user can store 1000GB of photos or videos completely for free. Strangely, the cost for 2 TB is $499 per year.
Pro Provides photo meta-data
Users can see lots of info on each picture including: shutter speed, camera and lens model, category tags, license info, aperture, and location.
Pro Social integration
People on Snapr can share their photos directly to Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and Foursquare.
Pro High social integration
Snapr allows direct sharing to Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and Foursquare.
Pro Explore by tag or city
In order to get a view of what is going on in a city, Snapr has a feature that can be used to view pictures from one specific area. For people who aren't concerned with viewing other cities, they can use the tag system to explore.
Cons
Con Low quality in-app camera
The in-app camera is lower quality than standard camera apps, so it's better to take a photo normally and then import it into Flikr.
Con Underdeveloped community
While this app has potential, the community is not big enough for the intended experience.