Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing UXPin vs UX-App, the Slant community recommends UX-App for most people. In the question“What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?” UX-App is ranked 26th while UXPin is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose UX-App is:
UX-App uses a drag and drop puzzle like JavaScript representation. Unique and expressive
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro UXPin has great advanced features for prototyping
integration if this then dop that and custom javascript functionality
Pro Actively developed
UXPin is constantly being updated with new features.
Pro Import from PhotoShop and Sketch
A pro UXPin account will allow you to import existing projects from PhotoShop or Sketch.
Pro Extensive library of elements and patterns
UXPin offers elements from a wide range libraries. This includes responsive frameworks such as Bootstrap and Foundation, and libraries specific to mobile prototyping.
Pro Prototype with graphical JavaScript
UX-App uses a drag and drop puzzle like JavaScript representation. Unique and expressive
Pro Mock up & prototype in the browser
Allows you to mock up with real HTML, and present expressive prototypes in the browser. Has lots of conveniences like team chat, notes, and a share link to present prototypes.
Pro Long free trial & cheap subscription
It's possible to start without creating an account. Creating a free account extends the trial, and the memberships are cheap @ $5/month.
Cons
Con Expensive subscription model
$29 per user/mo ($350 pa) will soon rack up compared to a standalone product like Axure PRO ($450) which has a license that lasts years (they have given out free updates for the last 2 versions).
Con Steep learning curve
UXPin is one of the more complex prototyping tools. Combined with a lack of documentation, it can be discouraging for first time users.
