When comparing Quake III Arena vs Counter-Strike 1.6, the Slant community recommends Counter-Strike 1.6 for most people. In the question“What are the best LAN party PC games?” Counter-Strike 1.6 is ranked 7th while Quake III Arena is ranked 43rd. The most important reason people chose Counter-Strike 1.6 is:
Ranging from easy to expert, there are 4 difficulty modes available to the user. This way any skill level can enjoy the game.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Worthwhile time investment for competitive play
Not many available FPS games have such a high skill ceiling as Quake III Arena, making this a great game to invest time into, for those that want to get to a competitive level.
Pro Offline LAN support
By using a LAN connection, multiple computers can facilitate multiplayer without the need for an internet connection.
Pro You can easily run the game on low end PC's
Due to the age of the title (released 1999) and the requirements of said title in the modern day, the game can easily be played on just about any PC from the last 10 years.
Pro Plenty of variation with multiple game modes keeps the gameplay fresh
Deathmatch, Team Deathmatch and Capture the Flag are the various modes that players can select within the game. This allows for enough change in gameplay for the user so that the game never gets old too fast.
Pro 4 difficulty modes to suit the player's preference and skill level
Ranging from easy to expert, there are 4 difficulty modes available to the user. This way any skill level can enjoy the game.
Pro Anyone can run the game as it easily runs on low end systems
Being an older game, it is able to be run on aging or underpowered systems without issue, meaning just about anyone can boot the game up and play it.
Pro Huge map selection with 18 maps available to the player
There are 18 maps available to play on, with three being the only ones selectable until the others are unlocked through progressive gameplay.
Pro Great for those looking for deep gameplay that requires dedication
For those looking for a deep first person shooter that requires a lot of dedication and skill, Counter Strike is a very popular option. While not for everyone, those that want to spend their time really learning all of the mechanics, maps and weapons in order to excel at a game, Counter Strike should fill that void.
Pro No need to worry about what OS is installed on your PC
Counter-Strike 1.6 can be installed and run on Windows, Linux and macOS, making it extremely flexible. This is great for those that run multiple OS's in their house, as they can still play the game on any of their machines.
Pro Very affordable
You can usually pick it up for just a few dollars on sale.
Pro Easily find matches thanks to the hugely active community
Despite the games age, it is extremely popular. This means there is no issue with finding online matches to play, no matter the time of day.
Pro nostalgia
If you used to play CS 1.6 with your friends at their/your house you know what i mean.
Cons
Con Poor quality voice-overs
Given that it is an older title and thus released when studios put little money towards quality voice-overs, Quake III Arena stands out as one of the worst of its kind, not least on account of the game announcer who is one of the main culprits.
Con Requires too much dedication and time
In order to be competitive in this game, dedication and practice are necessary, something that many players will simply not have the time for.
Con Dated game that shows its age
Released in the early 2000's, the graphical fidelity of the game shows its age quite a bit. This is to be expected of a game of this age, but may detract from the experience if graphics are an important part of a game to the player.
Con It's not competitive
It's not a competitive game at all,like any other CS game.
Maybe play it just for fun but also meh.