When comparing Quake III Arena vs Empire Earth, the Slant community recommends Empire Earth for most people. In the question“What are the best LAN party PC games?” Empire Earth is ranked 34th while Quake III Arena is ranked 43rd. The most important reason people chose Empire Earth is:
Fight in 14 different epochs. You can start 10,000 BC and develop your civilization up to the future. Each time period being notable, thus creating a change in gameplay and scenery.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Worthwhile time investment for competitive play
Not many available FPS games have such a high skill ceiling as Quake III Arena, making this a great game to invest time into, for those that want to get to a competitive level.
Pro Offline LAN support
By using a LAN connection, multiple computers can facilitate multiplayer without the need for an internet connection.
Pro You can easily run the game on low end PC's
Due to the age of the title (released 1999) and the requirements of said title in the modern day, the game can easily be played on just about any PC from the last 10 years.
Pro Plenty of variation with multiple game modes keeps the gameplay fresh
Deathmatch, Team Deathmatch and Capture the Flag are the various modes that players can select within the game. This allows for enough change in gameplay for the user so that the game never gets old too fast.
Pro Evolving gameplay and scenery
Fight in 14 different epochs. You can start 10,000 BC and develop your civilization up to the future. Each time period being notable, thus creating a change in gameplay and scenery.
Cons
Con Poor quality voice-overs
Given that it is an older title and thus released when studios put little money towards quality voice-overs, Quake III Arena stands out as one of the worst of its kind, not least on account of the game announcer who is one of the main culprits.
Con Long battles
Aging up takes a lot of time making battles a lot longer. Which many may not want to sink the time into.