When comparing Razer OSVR Hacker Dev Kit vs Sulon Q, the Slant community recommends Sulon Q for most people. In the question“What are the best VR headsets?” Sulon Q is ranked 6th while Razer OSVR Hacker Dev Kit is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Sulon Q is:
With 2 cameras on front of the unit, the Sulon Q can produce a 3D map of the room you're in without the need for stationary sensors to track your movement. This also means that it can track the position of your hands, meaning there will be no need to hold onto controllers.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Open hardware
The hardware is under an open license, so it's great for hardware hackers to make and share their improvements. The plastic part 3d models are open and can be printed on a 3d printer as well meaning users are free to customize the looks of the device as well.
This also means any manufacturer is free to produce a device using the open hardware and software. Which can lead to more competition which can lead to lower price points.
Pro Modular design
The HMD is designed to be upgradeable, meaning components can be switched out and upgraded as desired. Users can also upgrade between official versions.
Pro Pretty cheap
Its only $299 for the kit, which is nearly half the cost of the Oculus or Vive.
Pro Only requires a mid-spec PC
This makes it usable by a much bigger range of customers. Most gamers will already have a PC that can support this HMD. Specific minimum specs aren't listed.
Pro FPGA for hardware programming
A FPGA is included which allows hardware hackers to better integrate their modifications. FPGAs also make the HMD more flexible.
Pro Individual eye focusing
Users who have different focus points for each eye will rejoice! You can individually focus the left/right lenses to make sure you get the clearest image for yourself.
Pro Controller-free 3D tracking
With 2 cameras on front of the unit, the Sulon Q can produce a 3D map of the room you're in without the need for stationary sensors to track your movement. This also means that it can track the position of your hands, meaning there will be no need to hold onto controllers.
Pro AR as well as VR
Virtual reality is available, however this headset also supports augmented reality. This bridges virtual reality with the real world, allowing VR components to overlap in the real world.
You can see an example of the Augmented reality in the Magic Beans Demo video.
Pro Wear and play
The Sulon Q can be used completely un-tethered. That means no cables to drag around, and no need to worry about upgrading your PC to be VR-ready. It incorporates PC components right into the headset - 256GB SSD, 8GB RAM, AMD FX-8800P process and a Radeon R7 graphics card. It also includes a 2560x1440p OLED display to complete the build.
These components are housed in the box that rests on the back of the wearer's head, and helps balance out the weight of the headset.
Pro Great displays
There are two OLED displays with a total resolution of 2560x1440 - beating out the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive slightly. The Sulon Q's displays can manage a 90Hz refresh rate which is said to reduce motion-nausea significantly.
Cons
Con Headband not that comfortable
The device uses a tri-band design to attach to ones head. This can be uncomfortable due to how many straps there are and their placement. Other devices use a triangular design which is often considered more comfortable.
Con Low res screens
The included screens for the device are 960 x 1,080, which is less than full HD (1920x1080). Compared to other popular headsets this is low, which can lead to less crisp graphics (most other VR solutions use 1080p or 1440p).
Con Likely expensive
Because all of the components are integrated into the unit (GPU, CPU, battery), this will raise the cost instead of offloading the processing to a dedicated computer.
Con Console quality
While its not definitive what "console quality" specifically means, don't expect insane framerates. With the on-board GPU and battery, there's only going to be so much performance available.
Con Likely very heavy
Because it's un-tethered, it needs the CPU, GPU, as well as a hefty battery installed on the unit. The final weight isn't known yet, but it's likely going to be quite heavy.