When comparing FOVE vs Immersion-Vrelia Pro-DG1 HMD, the Slant community recommends FOVE for most people. In the question“What are the best VR headsets?” FOVE is ranked 4th while Immersion-Vrelia Pro-DG1 HMD is ranked 17th. The most important reason people chose FOVE is:
Foveated rendering is a rendering method where the quality of the image (and subsequently the processing power needed to render the image) throughout the image is different. It allows rendering only the parts the user is focused on in high quality and lower the resource usage of the device considerably.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Plans to have foveated rendering
Foveated rendering is a rendering method where the quality of the image (and subsequently the processing power needed to render the image) throughout the image is different. It allows rendering only the parts the user is focused on in high quality and lower the resource usage of the device considerably.
Pro Supports eye tracking
The device has a built in eye tracking function that is supposed to help with things like targeting, much like eye targeting used in fighter jets.
Pro Able to access lots of content
Originally only Unity, Unreal Engine, and Cryengine were supported, but support for OpenVR and Steam VR are in the works. This will ensure there is plenty of content available for the Fove.
Pro Crisp graphics
The picture is meant to be clear due to the quad HD (2560x1140) display. This high resolution will help text and edges of round objects look crisp.
Pro Easily adjust the lenses
The lenses in the unit are adjustable for separation of eyes as well as for near or far sightedness. This makes sure the unit will work for most people no matter they eye spacing or sight abilities.
Cons
Con Fove's eye-tracking technology is terrible.
It is hard to apply to the game, and it is very inaccurate.
Con Currently eye tracking has to be calibrated at the start of every game
The built in eye tracking currently has to be recalibrated every time a new demo/game is started. This can be time consuming and interrupts the flow of play for those that like to try out many different games in one session.
Con Highly demanding specs
The recommended specs for this device is a PC that can run modern games at 2560x1440 at 100fps or greater. This means the one will need a very high powered GPU CPU combo.
Con Not meant for VR
The product page doesn't mention virtual reality, instead it seems to be focused on augmented virtuality (overlaying virtual components into the real world instead of totally immersing the user into a virtual reality).
Con Looks cheap
The front of the device is quite large, looking like it is using a cheap screen that will have quite a lot of weight on the front of the device. No price has been announced, but the looks of the unit on trade show floors looks pretty generic and shoddily put together.