Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing SpiderOak vs Codeberg, the Slant community recommends Codeberg for most people. In the question“What are the best file sharing services?” Codeberg is ranked 5th while SpiderOak is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Codeberg is:
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Combines cloud syncing, storage service and backup client
Thus you have a single service for all of the things.
Pro Available for many platforms
The Spideroak client is available for Linux, MacOS, Windows, Android and iOS.
Pro Incrementals
SpiderOak updates only that part of the file that has changed, saving bandwidth and time.
Pro Zero knowledge
Data is locally encrypted before uploading to Spideroak. They cannot recover your data even if they wanted to since it is stored in encrypted state on their servers.
Pro Unintrusive
Pro Open source
Fully open source, no subscription plans. Every available feature is provided for free and every new feature with each update will be free as well, forever.
Pro Intuitive user interface
Easy to mess around and feels very natural in general.
Pro Managed by a non-profit organization
Codeberg is community driven and managed by a non-profit organization based in Berlin, Germany. The servers are also managed by them. In conclusion, your privacy and source code is protected!
Pro Lightweight
Codeberg uses Gitea as its Git software so it's extremely lightweight. Especially compared to Gitlab or Github.
Cons
