When comparing ReNoise 3.0 vs Magix Samplitude X, the Slant community recommends Magix Samplitude X for most people. In the question“What are the best DAWs? ” Magix Samplitude X is ranked 12th while ReNoise 3.0 is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose Magix Samplitude X is:
No other DAW provides Object FX automation.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Requires minimum mouse input
Shortcuts and other methods are used in order to minimize the amount of work that users must do with a mouse. This can greatly increase the efficiency of a workflow.
Pro Very stable
DAWs are notorious for crashing, especially at the peak of a workflow. ReNoise 3 is known for its outstanding stability.
Pro Optimized for dual monitors
Users who have more than one monitor can view the sampler, plugins, and MIDI controls in the instrument editor, which can be moved to a second monitor.
Pro Uses a module tracker instead of piano roll
Module trackers are preferred by some users because they help increase productivity.
Pro Sophisticated effect modulation
ReNoise 3 offers a ridiculous amount of flexibility when it comes to automation. Instead automating by sliding points around, users can choose from an array of preloaded automation patterns in order to produce more interesting sounding patterns.
Pro Highly customizeable effect chains
Effects can be applied to samples in Instrument Editor in addition to being sent through track input. This is highly useful when dealing with multi-sample instruments, as each sample can have one or more effect chains.
Pro Limitless sampler
The sampler is deeply embedded in the way the whole DAW works, and it allows the user to build complex synth sounds with ease.
Pro Unique grid based tracker
ReNoise 3 replaces the typical piano roll with a tracker, which is claimed to be "the most powerful tracker in existence". The difference between piano roll and tracker is that piano roll moves horizontally, while trackers move vertically. Users may find this confusing at first, but trackers make it simple to customize every individual note.
Pro Fast yet intricate workflow
Building basic patterns (e.g. drums) from scratch is extremely fast and easy, and built-in effects commands allow for fine grain control that is difficult, time consuming or outright impossible in conventional DAWs.
Pro Vst support
Pro Program custom tools
Users can make their own instruments and effects using Lua .
Pro Advanced pattern command
The Pattern Command called "MaYbe" guesses which note will be next in a progression based on the user's habits.
Pro Object based editing
No other DAW provides Object FX automation.
Pro Advanced object editing
Cutting, slicing, duplication, control, effects, wave editing and more.
Pro Customisable UI
You can organise your work space. All windows are ready to put wherever you wish. Samplitude also support docking and skins.
Pro Runs 64 and 32 bit plugs
Pro Very MIDI friendly
MIDI is a breeze in this program, especially with the MIDI editing tools and object based editing, it makes the workflow so much smoother.
Pro Good plugins and software included
Plugins and software included like isotope elements and sound forge .
Pro Great onboard vocal tuning tool
Elastic Audio is fast, simple and effective.
Pro Multiple video files in a single project
Pro Incredibly stable compared to other DAWs
Pro Simple, accessible track and effect automation
Nearly everything is possible. Even the onboard plugins are excellent. Multitrack recording and automated mixing at the same time. All plugins are usable object based. Depending on the capabilities of the computer, it's possible to providing headphone mixes with very low latency right through the machine. Even using the onboard Variverb.
Pro Interproject-operability
This feature is not found in other DAW's novadays. You can just drag'n'drop, copy/paste objects, tracks, whatever inbetween multiple projects. You might have 4 or more projects where you want to interchange content. Nothing as simple as that in samplitude.
Cons
Con Cannot record multiple tracks simultaneously
Live musicians are limited by only being able to record on one tracks at a time.
Con Interface can be confusing to people who's not familiar with trackers
Trackers are different from sequencing (arrangement) view (most DAWs) and session view (Ableton, Bitwig).
Con Closed source
Con No PulseAudio support
Without JACK or ALSA set up as your Linux sound system, audio will play from Renoise or from other applications, but not both at the same time.
Con Some 32 bit plug-ins fail
Con Proprietary
Does not respect your freedom. Does not provide source code.