When comparing Magix Samplitude vs LMMS, the Slant community recommends LMMS for most people. In the question“What are the best DAWs?” LMMS is ranked 8th while Magix Samplitude is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose LMMS is:
LMMS is available for free with source code licensed under GPL and available on [GitHub](https://github.com/LMMS/lmms) allowing anyone to edit and extend the software as they see fit.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Simple, accessible track and effect automation
Nearly everything is possible. Even the onboard plugins are excellent. Multitrack recording and automated mixing at the same time. All plugins are usable object based. Dependent on the capabilities of the computer it's possible providing headphone mixes with very low latency right through the machine. Even using the onboard Variverb.
Pro Runs 64 and 32 bit plugs
Pro Advanced object editing
Cutting, slicing, duplication, control, effects, wave editing and more.
Pro Very MIDI friendly
MIDI is a breeze in this program, especially with the MIDI editing tools and object based editing, it makes the workflow so much smoother.
Pro Free and open source
LMMS is available for free with source code licensed under GPL and available on GitHub allowing anyone to edit and extend the software as they see fit.
Pro Has the possibility to become a great open-source alternative to FL Studio
-interface look like FL Studio interface
-main workspace for composing and editing melodies and harmonies is piano roll
LMMS works on Linux, Windows and OSX.
Pro VST Support
Pro VST plugins support
LMMS is lightweight enough to be run off of a flash drive.
Pro Multiple languages support
Pro LADSPA plugins support
Pro MIDI controllers support
Pro JACK Audio Connection Kit support
Pro Works with many VSTs and effects
Con Some 32 bit plug-ins fail
Con Program crashes a lot
This happens more frequently when loading VST files.
Con No merging or splicing options
There is no feature that allows you to merge or splice tracks in LMMS.