When comparing MOTU Digital Performer vs Zrythm, the Slant community recommends MOTU Digital Performer for most people. In the question“What are the best DAWs? ” MOTU Digital Performer is ranked 6th while Zrythm is ranked 25th. The most important reason people chose MOTU Digital Performer is:
You can change themes and waveform and meter colors.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Customizable UI
You can change themes and waveform and meter colors.
Pro 64 bit compatibility
Digital Performer 8 does away with low RAM limits by including 64 bit compatibility.
Pro Stable DAW
Pro Easy to learn
Easy to learn with the included videos on the websites.
Pro Comprehensive MIDI and audio editors
Pro Multiple sequences
You can have multiple sequences for variant ideas.
Pro MIDI friendly
Pro Unlimited tracks
Pro Easy to use
All clear and easy, yet a powerful DAW.
Pro VST3 Support
Pro Easy to install
Pro Pitch correction
Correct audio like in Melodyne.
Pro Support for 32- and 64-bit floating point sound files
Pro Advanced film scoring capabilities
Equipped with tools and film scoring features.
Pro Nano Sampler 2.0
Great Sampler for more audio editing.
Pro MPE Support
MIDI Polyphonic Expression. Good For recording multi-channel output from an MPE controller.
Pro Beat Detection Engine 2.0
Pro ZTX PRO technology
Speeding up or transposing audio material of any kind.
Pro DP training webinars
You can become a DP expert software user.
Pro Live Performance Mode
Good for live performance.
Pro Monolithic
Unlike many Linux DAWs, Zrythm comes in one coherent program.
Pro Free software
AGPLv3 licensed with source code available.
Pro Cross-platform
Installers can be bought for Linux, MacOS and Windows. Or you can compile the source code for free on any platform.
Pro Intuitive U.I.
Ability to add MIDI notes, Automate, & Modulate with ease alongside chord assistance.
Pro Looks visually good and the performance is also amazing
Cons
Con Clunky a bit
Con A bit expensive
Costs $500 for both box and download version.
Con Not so great support
Con Substandard audio stretching
DP 8 supports audio stretching, but the quality often doesn't remain after the sound has been modified.
Con Only free if you compile the source code
