When comparing LMMS vs Sequel 3, the Slant community recommends LMMS for most people. In the question“What are the best DAWs?” LMMS is ranked 8th while Sequel 3 is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose LMMS is:
LMMS is available for free with source code licensed under GPL and available on [GitHub](https://github.com/LMMS/lmms) allowing anyone to edit and extend the software as they see fit.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Free and open source
LMMS is available for free with source code licensed under GPL and available on GitHub allowing anyone to edit and extend the software as they see fit.
Pro Has the possibility to become a great open-source alternative to FL Studio
-interface look like FL Studio interface
-main workspace for composing and editing melodies and harmonies is piano roll
LMMS works on Linux, Windows and OSX.
Pro VST Support
Pro VST plugins support
LMMS is lightweight enough to be run off of a flash drive.
Pro Multiple languages support
Pro LADSPA plugins support
Pro MIDI controllers support
Pro JACK Audio Connection Kit support
Pro Works with many VSTs and effects
Pro Designed to be easy to learn
Sequel 3 was made by the folks behind Cubase, and it is meant to be lighter and easier to learn. This program's focus on loops and computer generated drum patterns makes the process easier for people with no music knowledge.
Pro Dedicated beat page
There is a page exclusively meant for generating drum patterns.
Con Program crashes a lot
This happens more frequently when loading VST files.
Con No merging or splicing options
There is no feature that allows you to merge or splice tracks in LMMS.