When comparing EnergyXT vs Seq24, the Slant community recommends Seq24 for most people. In the question“What are the best DAWs? ” Seq24 is ranked 41st while EnergyXT is ranked 46th. The most important reason people chose Seq24 is:
Seq24 can be used and edited by anyone for free.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Very quick to start and to put together a track
Pro Low system requirements
This program requires only 512MB RAM and 1.4GHz processing speed.
Pro Multi-track recording
Audio can be recorded to multiple tracks at the same time.
Pro Very easy and efficient to use
Most tasks are very simple and straightforward.
Very clean and intuitive interface. You can do almost anything.
Pro Open source
Seq24 can be used and edited by anyone for free.
Cons
Con Outdated
Con No auto-save
While there's no autosave, you can still try to recover your work if EnergyXT crashes from a file named temp_file_name.xt.
Con Vague purpose
EnergyXT is marketed as a DAW, ultra portable studio, DAW extension, and a VST. While the variety of uses is nice, it's hard to understand the best function of this program.
Con MIDI only
Seq24 only has MIDI capability, no audio clips allowed.
Con Low compatibility
Seq24 only runs on Linux and win32.
