Here’s the Deal

Slax vs Trisquel GNU/Linux

224 54

144 28

When comparing Slax vs Trisquel GNU/Linux, the Slant community recommends Trisquel GNU/Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Trisquel GNU/Linux is ranked 29th while Slax is ranked 54th. The most important reason people chose Trisquel GNU/Linux is:

Fresh installation looks great.

Specs

Based OnDebian or Slackware

Default Desktop EnvironmentFluxbox

Init-SystemSystemd

Main UsagePortable & lightweight Desktop

OS FamilyGNU+Linux

OriginCzech Republic

Package Managerslackpkg or dpkg with apt

Official Supported Architecturesi386, amd64

Based OnDebian>Ubuntu

Default Desktop EnvironmentGNOME, LXDE, MATE, Openbox

Init-SystemSystemd

Main UsageDesktop without unfree software

OS FamilyGNU+Linux

OriginSpain

Package ManagerDebian Package Manager

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?

What are the best Debian-based Linux distributions?

What are the best Linux distributions for misanthropes?

Pros

Pro
Persistent changes

Changes you make in the configuration persist if you run from USB.

Pro
Pretty fast to boot up

It was considerably fast to turn on when booting from cd.

Pro
Modules

Standard tar archives plus some simple shell scripting produces modules that you can load dynamically into the OS for added apps and functionality.

Pro
Modern desktop

Pro
Small footprint

About 200mb, but with a full KDE4 environment and loads of useful apps.

Pro
Polished look and feel

Fresh installation looks great.

Pro
Reliable and working great out-of-the-box

It works on many machines. Really good.

Pro
Good but not so good

There's been a lot of effort put in this project through the years, there is no question about it. It's 100% free and it's very user-friendly, but it being based on Ubuntu 16.04 isn't the best thing, as you are working with software that still is actual but the versions are not the newest.

Ad
Cons

Con
Overly complicated HDD/SSD installation

While it has a nice layout Slax's lack of an installer tool like Tinycore's just can't be justified. It seems strange that it comes built in with programs that some users may not want, yet it doesn't have an easy way to install it. Due to its heavier use of RAM, built in software, and lack of an installer its hard to choose it over TC.

Con
Works slowly on old computers

Con
Infrequent releases

Since Slax is maintained by only one person, releases are not that frequent. So it may take a while to get bug fixes or new features once you start using it.