Here’s the Deal

Slax vs KDE Neon

224 54

1073 200

When comparing Slax vs KDE Neon, the Slant community recommends KDE Neon for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” KDE Neon is ranked 36th while Slax is ranked 54th. The most important reason people chose KDE Neon is:

Since it's built on the strong Ubuntu base, KDE Neon works seamlessly with a huge variety of hardware.

Specs

Based OnDebian or Slackware

Default Desktop EnvironmentFluxbox

Init-SystemSystemd

Main UsagePortable & lightweight Desktop

Official Supported Architecturesi386, amd64

OriginCzech Republic

Package Managerslackpkg or dpkg with apt

OS FamilyGNU+Linux

Based OnDebian>Ubuntu LTS

Default Desktop EnvironmentKDE

Init-SystemSystemd

Main UsageDesktop, Showcase for the KDE Desktop

Official Supported Architecturesamd64

OriginUnited Kingdom

Package ManagerDebian Package Manager

Release ScheduleSemi-Rolling

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?

What are the best Debian-based Linux distributions?

What are the best Linux distributions for misanthropes?

Pros

Pro
Persistent changes

Changes you make in the configuration persist if you run from USB.

Pro
Pretty fast to boot up

It was considerably fast to turn on when booting from cd.

Pro
Modules

Standard tar archives plus some simple shell scripting produces modules that you can load dynamically into the OS for added apps and functionality.

Pro
Modern desktop

Pro
Small footprint

About 200mb, but with a full KDE4 environment and loads of useful apps.

Pro
Works out of the box

Since it's built on the strong Ubuntu base, KDE Neon works seamlessly with a huge variety of hardware.

Pro
Configurability

KDE Neon uses KDE as its desktop environment, which is highly configurable, but also has great defaults.

Pro
The best looking Linux OS

It really is a great and stunning looking OS.

Pro
Works well on low-end computers

Ad
Cons

Con
Overly complicated HDD/SSD installation

While it has a nice layout Slax's lack of an installer tool like Tinycore's just can't be justified. It seems strange that it comes built in with programs that some users may not want, yet it doesn't have an easy way to install it. Due to its heavier use of RAM, built in software, and lack of an installer its hard to choose it over TC.

Con
Works slowly on old computers

Con
Infrequent releases

Since Slax is maintained by only one person, releases are not that frequent. So it may take a while to get bug fixes or new features once you start using it.