When comparing Syntaxic vs CudaText, the Slant community recommends CudaText for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source text editors for programming?” CudaText is ranked 13th while Syntaxic is ranked 38th. The most important reason people chose CudaText is:
About ~180 programming languages supported at the time of writing either built-in or can be added easily with the addon manager.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Cross-platform
Syntaxic is available on Windows, OSX, and Linux.
Pro Built-in Shell
Syntaxic has a built-in terminal emulator.
Pro Code completion
Syntaxic offers symbol completion.
Pro SSH editing
Syntaxic permits editing files through SSH and it also supports features such as sudo
, su
, and tunneling.
Pro Many programming languages supported for syntax highlighting
About ~180 programming languages supported at the time of writing either built-in or can be added easily with the addon manager.
Pro Minimap plugin available
Pro Addons can be developed in Python
Pro Package for Linux ARM available
Pro Addon manager
Useful built-in addon manager.
Cons
Con Lacks file preview
There's no file preview in Syntaxic when selecting a file in the file tree.
Con Can't load binary files
An error results when you try to load a binary file in Syntaxic.
Con Can't switch syntax highlighting on the fly
Con Non-intuitive controls.
For example, you can only move tabs inside of group, not to other groups, or to a new window by dragging and dropping.
Con Not free
Syntaxic needs a license code to work which costs $20 until version 1.0 hits, and once it does it will be $35.