Here’s the Deal

Unity Sprite Packer vs GAF:Flash to Unity

2 1

7 0

When comparing Unity Sprite Packer vs GAF:Flash to Unity, the Slant community recommends GAF:Flash to Unity for most people. In the question“What are the best tools to create sprite atlases for Unity 2D?” GAF:Flash to Unity is ranked 3rd while Unity Sprite Packer is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose GAF:Flash to Unity is:

GAF supports such Flash features as: Masks support; Filters support; No limitations on timeline; Conversion of shape tweens; Frame labels.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best tools to create sprite atlases for Unity 2D?

Pros

Pro
Create Custom Output Via Code

Set custom packing specified by code useful for those who have to follow a guideline on packed sprites.

Pro
Comes built into Unity

The Pro license brings full 2D support within Unity without having to use an external program or plugin for creating atlases.

Pro
Can convert 99% of what can be done in Flash

GAF supports such Flash features as:
Masks support;
Filters support;
No limitations on timeline;
Conversion of shape tweens;
Frame labels.

Pro
No need to use large Sprite Sheets

With GAF converter you get a highly optimized texture atlas and a config file. You don't need to take trouble over cumbersome sprite sheets. You can easily modify an already working in Unity animation and play around with the animations parts whenever you need.

Pro
Alows using Flash animations in Unity

You can convert Flash animations directly in Unity with the help of plug-in. The converted .gaf file consists of a texturte atlas and a binary config.