When comparing Sunflower Twin-Panel File Manager vs Nemo, the Slant community recommends Sunflower Twin-Panel File Manager for most people. In the question“What are the best Total Commander alternatives for Linux and OSX?” Sunflower Twin-Panel File Manager is ranked 7th while Nemo is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Sunflower Twin-Panel File Manager is:
Sunflower is free and open source, the source code is freely available on [GitHub](https://github.com/MeanEYE/Sunflower).
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Sunflower is free and open source, the source code is freely available on GitHub.
Pro Python code
Easy to enhance and fix because of Python's relative simplicity.
Very fast and light without losing functionality.
The most stylish among all FMs.
Pro Easily open as root
Option to open folder as root from within the right click menu.
Pro Easily open file location in terminal
Option to open a folder in terminal, which can help executing commands such as bash.
Pro Has dual pane functionality
This functionality was removed in Nautilus and Dolphin at least in Ubuntu-Gnome, but Nemo kept this option, making the obvious functionality of cut, copy and paste much easier.
Nemo can be extended to have additional features through third party plugins.
Pro Double pane and search by name capabilities
Pro Supports bookmarking
You can bookmark folders that you open often, this way you can easily access them from anywhere while using Nemo.
Pro Good networking options
Supports ftp, ssh and samba connections.
Pro Queues file operations
Con Doesnt start on Fedora 26
Con Changing the background color or font type for customization is not practical
You have to do it with finding and editing the relevant CSS files. No buttons, menus or sliders for such customization.
Con Incomplete mimetypes
Like all nautilus forks it allows you to run svg-files due some incomplete mimetype coverage.
Con Depends on GNOME
Depends on gnome toolkits an libraries.