When comparing Orwell Dev-C++ vs C++Builder, the Slant community recommends C++Builder for most people. In the question“What are the best IDEs for C++ on Windows?” C++Builder is ranked 8th while Orwell Dev-C++ is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose C++Builder is:
The Windows framework, called VCL, wraps native WinAPI controls. It's far more powerful than something like MFC, including its visual design and the library of available first- and third-party controls.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Lightweight
Not as bloated as other C++ compilers.
Pro Simple
Often recommended for beginners.
Pro Has portable versions with MinGW32 and TDM-GCC x64 compilers
Pro Windows UI framework
The Windows framework, called VCL, wraps native WinAPI controls. It's far more powerful than something like MFC, including its visual design and the library of available first- and third-party controls.
Pro Free community edition
Features are the same as Professional Edition.
Pro Cross-platform UI framework
FireMonkey (FMX) is a cross-platform UI framework, GPU-accelerated, supporting native controls on some platforms, and native feel everywhere else.
Pro Drag and Drop Functionality
C++Builder allows. you to drag and drop components on the design form which makes the development process simple.
Pro Cross-platform targeting
Can build targeting Windows, iOS, macOS, and Android.
Pro Clang-based compilers
Cons
Con Too focused on adding IDE features developers don't want
Con IDE has long lasting bugs that Embarcadero won't fix
Con Expensive
€1,719.00+ (or $1971.61+) (on 01/2019).