Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing File Explorer vs FX File Explorer, the Slant community recommends FX File Explorer for most people. In the question“What are the best file explorers on Android?” FX File Explorer is ranked 8th while File Explorer is ranked 21st. The most important reason people chose FX File Explorer is:
FX File Explorer has a [paid Plus add-on](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=nextapp.fx.rk) that add more functionality to the app such as network file browsing and a built in text editor. It costs $2.99 and has a 24 hour return policy.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Completely free and zero advertisements
There is zero cost to using this app as well as zero advertisements in the app itself.
Pro Open Source
File Explorer is filed under the GPL v3 license.
Pro Plus add-on for network browsing
FX File Explorer has a paid Plus add-on that add more functionality to the app such as network file browsing and a built in text editor. It costs $2.99 and has a 24 hour return policy.
Pro Material Design
FX File Explorer utilizes the Material Design guidelines set forth by Google.
Pro PRO SMB2 support
Pro Supports many compression and uncompression file formats
FX File Explorer features numerous compression file formats such as .zip or .tar as well as a .rar decompression tool.
Pro Root add-on
There is a free root user add-on that allows root file editing and viewing.
Cons
Con Can not select multiple files at the same time
There is no multi-select file support in the app, which means no batch copy, paste or deletions.
Con SMB where?
Unable to find the option to connect to an SMB server without upgrading to "pro" version. Can it even be done in the free version?
Con Dreadful interface
A great example of what happens when a developer puts form before function. Pretty to look at but awkward and unintuitive to use.
Con New Material Design look is not that great
FX File Explorer use to have a better design to it before the Material Design overhaul.
