When comparing Asus RT-N56U vs PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900), the Slant community recommends PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900) for most people. In the question“What are the best wifi-routers?” PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900) is ranked 7th while Asus RT-N56U is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900) is:
Easy and stable.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Good routing throughput
RT-N56U achieves a wired bidirectional throughput of up to 1268 Mbps. For wireless throughput the 2.4GHz band provides an average up/down throughput of 80Mbps and the 5GHz band provides an average up/down throughput of 240Mbps.
Pro Intuitive web interface
Pro Has 2 11n radios that support WDS bridging and repeating
Pro LED status indicators
Blue lights in front of the panel indicate status of power, USB ports, wired and wireless connections.
Pro Has 4 LAN, 1 WAN and 2 USB ports
Pro Can use open wrt and asus router firmware
Easy and stable.
Cons
Con Lacks three-stream 450Mbps wireless standard
Con Takes a long time to apply changes through web interface
Con No support at all
There was no site you can get support, files etc, besides only one in Germany. This means no more updates.
Con Poor Firewall settings
The firewall only offers a few switchable on/off settings like DOS, Flooding and Ping from WAN. Not allowing filter acess to LAN etc.
Con Poor Parental Control
The Parental Control only filter access from devices by MAC address at specifics times, not allowing to block specific sites. If someone brings a new device, it can access whatever they want, easily bypassing the security.
Con Can't change the timezone
The region combo box is dimmed, so you can't chance the country (fixed at US). Even the time zone field selection is from GMT-6 to GMT-10.