When comparing SlickEdit vs Gnome Builder, the Slant community recommends Gnome Builder for most people. In the question“What are the best IDEs for C++ on Linux?” Gnome Builder is ranked 16th while SlickEdit is ranked 18th. The most important reason people chose Gnome Builder is:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Symbol analysis support
There are powerful symbol analysis features in SlickEdit, including context tagging and references.
Pro Extensive support for programming languages
SlickEdit supports over 50 programming languages on nine platforms.
Pro Integrated debuggers for multiple languages
Integrated debuggers for GNU C++, Java, Python, Perl, Ruby, and PHP.
Pro Built-in beautifier
The beautifier formats code as you type to help improve readability and consistency.
Pro Compiler tools
Pro Over 13 emulations
Choose from fifteen keyboard emulations, containing the key bindings and behaviors necessary to emulate other editors (e.g., CUA, Vim, GNU Emacs, etc.)
Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris SPARC, Solaris x86
Pro Portable mode
Possibility to set up a portable installation, to run on a USB drive for example.
Write custom macro commands, functions, dialogs and tool windows.
Pro Easy access to XCode projects
SlickEdit opens XCode projects with no conversions needed.
Pro Third party tool integration
Pro Easy access to Visual Studio workspace
SlickEdit opens Visual Studio workspace with no conversions needed.
Pro Popular version control system
Pro Great language support (for linux based projects)
Pro Integrates nicely into the GNOME Desktop Environment
Client-side decorations, good use of widgets.
Pro Terminal built in
Fully featured terminal is packaged.
Pro Integrated debugging
Pro Extendable through plugins
Pro Lovely find and replace tool with great REGEX support
Shows a live feedback of what matches the pattern/criteria entered.
Pro Supports versioning (git)
Shows diff indication and has branch integration too.
Pro Tiling Editor capability
Pro Integrated system-wide profiler for improving software performance
Good templates available to build applications, even to build gnome applications.
Con No project management
Because it is still in early development there are little project management functionalities.