When comparing Sloth vs Turbo FTP Client, the Slant community recommends Sloth for most people. In the question“What are the best Material Design apps?” Sloth is ranked 35th while Turbo FTP Client is ranked 58th. The most important reason people chose Sloth is:
Triggers such as if the headphones are plugged in or when connected to a certain Wi-Fi network can be set to change what apps are displayed in the overlay.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro A quick-access overlay changes what apps it displays based on a variety of triggers
Triggers such as if the headphones are plugged in or when connected to a certain Wi-Fi network can be set to change what apps are displayed in the overlay.
Pro Material design
Turbo FTP is developed within the Material Design guidelines making for a nice looking FTP app on Android that has a familiar interface for anyone familiar with Material Design.
Pro Supports multiple FTP configurations
Turbo FTP client handles FTP, FTPS, FTPES and SFTP protocols, making for a wide array of configurations that Turbo FTP Client can work with, no matter the FTP it needs to connect to or share.
Pro Multiview support
For Samsung devices that can use the multiview feature, Turbo FTP Client can utilize multiple windows.
Cons
Con Only 2 out of 8 triggers are available in the free version
Con Outdated
This app was last updated in July 2015, so there are potential vulnerabilities
Con Has low memory issues
Turbo FTP Client may run in to problems with a device running out of memory during a transfer, meaning the app will crash due to Android memory management. Making it difficult to successfully pull off transfers as well as use any other application during a transfer.