When comparing GO SMS Pro vs QuickPic, the Slant community recommends QuickPic for most people. In the question“What are the best Material Design apps?” QuickPic is ranked 55th while GO SMS Pro is ranked 164th. The most important reason people chose QuickPic is:
QuickPic displays photos ultra fast and performs better than most stock gallery apps. Developed with speed in mind, QuickPic will make working with any library of photos lightning quick.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Allows responding to messages without opening the app
When a new message is received, a window will pop up that has the message and allows answering it from there, without having to open the app. It can be dismissed by tapping anywhere else on the screen.
Pro Dual SIM support
Pro Has privacy protection features
Pro Fast performance loading photos
QuickPic displays photos ultra fast and performs better than most stock gallery apps. Developed with speed in mind, QuickPic will make working with any library of photos lightning quick.
Pro Supports multiple online photo album services
QuickPic integrates with: Flickr, Picasa, 500px, and many more.
Pro Supports hidden images
In order to hide an image, start the title with a period. This can be great for privacy purposes.
Pro Excellent file management tools
QuickPic offers excellent file management tools, with the ability to move and rename photos, users are in total control over the photo library. Easily find new photos by date or location with the grouping tool.
Pro Impressive video-player
Allows to lock a video in landscape mode and intuitive controls via swipe gestures.
Cons
Con Updates are removing features
The development team are seemingly wishing to streamline the application and as a consequence each update removes features that many long-time users appreciate.
Con Buggy and unstable since acquisition by Cheetah Mobile
v5.0.0, after acquisition by Cheetah Mobile, has countless bugs and basically nonoperational. This, probably, clone of original app, assembled from alternative, home-made and very low quality source code.
Con Untrustworthy
It's owned by Cheetah Mobile. That says it all.