Here’s the Deal

Audacious vs gmusicbrowser

227 40

46 13

When comparing Audacious vs gmusicbrowser, the Slant community recommends Audacious for most people. In the question“What are the best audio players for UNIX-like systems?” Audacious is ranked 1st while gmusicbrowser is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose Audacious is:

Audacious is a classic music player at heart that has not felt the need to weigh itself down with an assortment of unnecessary options. Advanced functionality can be attained through plugins available from within the program.

Specs

PlatformsWindows, Linux, BSD

No specs yet!

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best audio players for UNIX-like systems?

What are the best media managers for Linux?

Pros

Pro
Streamlined player not weighed down by unnecessary options

Pro
Tons of plugins

Pro
Lightweight

My audacious uses only 18.5 MB of RAM. It has a Winamp visualization style that's very minimized and convenient.

Pro
Support for Winamp themes

Audacious can switch from its GTK interface to one that matches the looks of the famous Winamp player. What's even better is that this interface supports any Winamp themes, which allows for more options.

Pro
Folder oriented player, but able to play any music container and highly configurable

Lets you play, delete and even change metadata of your music files.

Pro
The easiest player for multiple types of files

It plays dts, aac multichannel, etc.

Pro
Compatibility with most media formats

It's able to reproduce most of media formats without external plugins.

Pro
Great with large libraries

This program uses a tagging system to help you find the music you're looking for, and can even help find duplicates. It will also automatically sync with a folder, meaning you don't have to manually initiate a scan.

Pro
Cool AutoTagger

The smartest auto tagger out there. It has an intelligent regular expression system to tag the files based on the filename contents. If the name contains something like Band -Album - Track -Title www.download.mp3, the system lets you filter the metadata fields.

Pro
Large assortment of layouts

You can pretty much emulate your favorite media player layout inside of gmusicbrowser as it has a large assortment of pre-made layouts as well as an insurmountable amount of options for custom layouts.

Pro
Remembers playing/pause status even after restart

With most other options, you have to start the player, wait a few seconds, then click Play. Gmusicbrowser spares you the wait and plays music automatically upon startup (if you were playing music when you closed it previously).

Pro
Intelligent auto playlists

Automatically generated playlists with the criteria you decide. Great for big collections.

Ad
Cons

Con
No manual sorting fields

There is no option to add one's own categories to the sorting fields.

Con
Updates are not very frequent

Con
No bit perfect output past 24bit

Audiophiles require this, and while most users might not notice a difference, audiophiles will appreciate the improved audio quality.

Con
Buggy

For example when using Visual Studio Code and Audacious you get flicked out to the gnome login screen.

Con
It won't install on Linux Mint 21

Con
Held back by performance issues

Can be very slow, uses a lot of resources, and has a decent amount of lag when going between songs.

Con
Doesn't support media keys

Con
Unusual keyboard shortcuts

Space does not pause, for instance. This would have been useful, as hitting the space bar is easier than finding the play/pause button - most music players use the space bar in this fashion.

Con
Some plugins are outdated

Several plugins works on older versions of libraries no longer available for recent distros.

Con
Poor library management

Initial load may have issue skipping parts of ones library, re-scanning may not resolved the issue. It also may tax ones CPU quite a lot, during these load attempts.