When comparing Nuvola Player vs aqualung, the Slant community recommends aqualung for most people. In the question“What are the best audio players for UNIX-like systems?” aqualung is ranked 35th while Nuvola Player is ranked 42nd. The most important reason people chose aqualung is:
Aqualung offers continuous, gap-free playback of consecutive tracks. Your ears get exactly what's in the files – no silence inserted in-between.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Mpris v2 support
Nuvola supports Mpris v2 which means that there's sound menu support in most modern Linux desktop environments.
Pro Creates a native-like front-end for music streaming webapps
Nuvola Player permits the use of music streaming webapps like Amazon Cloud Player, Google Play Music, and Spotify with an interface that aims to work as much like a native desktop application as possible. It currently supports 15 music streaming services.
Pro Can be run from the command-line
Pro Gapless playback
Aqualung offers continuous, gap-free playback of consecutive tracks. Your ears get exactly what's in the files – no silence inserted in-between.
Pro LADSPA plugin support
You can use any suitable LADSPA plugin to enhance the music you are listening to. There are many different plugins out there, including equalizers, spatial enhancers, tube pre-amp simulators, etc.
Pro JACK Audio Server support
Pro Multiple skin support
There's support for multiple skins in aqualung; changing them is possible at any time.
Cons
Con Strong focus on online
Streams are nice. But what about what I want and have? Strong focus on online listening. And if that is what you want exclusively, this is bloat. Better go with something really focused, functional and SMALL.