When comparing Pragha Music Player vs MPlayer, the Slant community recommends Pragha Music Player for most people. In the question“What are the best audio players for UNIX-like systems?” Pragha Music Player is ranked 28th while MPlayer is ranked 43rd. The most important reason people chose Pragha Music Player is:
Pragha skips heavy features that slow it down, and the result is a very fast music player that always feels responsive even when handling large libraries.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Lightweight
Pragha skips heavy features that slow it down, and the result is a very fast music player that always feels responsive even when handling large libraries.
Pro Useful UI for your collection
If you love sorting your music folders manually, Pragha allows for a solution with access to your media library "as is". This allows for custom sorting, such as when songs were released so you can easily jump between time periods
Pro Needs no additional codecs
Everything MPlayer needs to play media files is contained within which means no outside codecs are needed.
Pro Easy shortcut keys
Quick skip ahead buttons and other shortcut keys.
Pro No bugs , no lag in the video display
Pro Works via CLI and has multiple frontends to choose from
Some of the more popular frontends include Deepin Media Player, GNOME MPlayer, KPlayer, KMPlayer, Rosa Media Player, SMPlayer and Xt7-Player.
Pro Nice theme available to choose from
Also, the video window is separate from the main window making it less cluttered while playing audio
Cons
Con Very basic
By design, Pragha is a basic app without any 'bells and whistles' features. It's functional, but don't expect it to do anything over and above the minimal.
Con Collection needs to be re-updated after adding new music
Pragha is unable to automatically add new items to your music collection unless a re-scan of all files is done, even when only adding single files.