pcmanfm-qt vs Worker
When comparing pcmanfm-qt vs Worker, the Slant community recommends Worker for most people. In the question“What are the best file managers for UNIX-like systems?” Worker is ranked 21st while pcmanfm-qt is ranked 36th. The most important reason people chose Worker is:
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Can open folder as root
PCManFM can open different folders as root, this way you don't have to use the terminal to move around files for which you need root permission.
Pro Simple
PCManFM is a very lightweight and simple file manager.
Pro Has a lot of features
... that only Dolphin, Krusader, Nemo & Nautilus has onboard -
but this one is a small footprint reliable friend.
Pro Innumerable button-click file ops are integrated
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Pro Remote access
Worker supports access to remote machines through various ways (ssh, ftp, rsh, http and webdav).
Pro Low system requirements
The system requirements for Worker are pretty low, making it a great option for lower-end machines. The reason why they are pretty low is because Worker is basically made of just X11 libraries.
Pro Configuration GUI
Worker has a built-in configuration GUI.
Cons
Con Some operations are slow
Because it tries to be as lightweight as possible and tries to use very little RAM. This can unfortunately lead to it being slow sometimes.