When comparing Worker vs FTP Synchronizer, the Slant community recommends Worker for most people. In the question“What are the best GUI file managers for UNIX-like systems?” Worker is ranked 16th while FTP Synchronizer is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose Worker is:
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Innumerable button-click file ops are integrated
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Pro Remote access
Worker supports access to remote machines through various ways (ssh, ftp, rsh, http and webdav).
Pro Low system requirements
The system requirements for Worker are pretty low, making it a great option for lower-end machines. The reason why they are pretty low is because Worker is basically made of just X11 libraries.
Pro Configuration GUI
Worker has a built-in configuration GUI.
Pro Can sync multiple files across multiple websites in parallel
With FTP Synchronizer you can synchronize multiple files and multiple sites simultaneously.
Pro Can schedule syncs
You can schedule when you want to synchronize a particular document for a particular website.
Pro Very secure
Supports syncing over FTPS and SFTP.
Pro Does not waste time by copying every file over
When syncing a folder, FTP Synchronizer intelligently finds out which files have been changed and copies only them.
Cons
Con Overpriced
Even using single license mode no longer functions correctly. No longer sending emails as it says it does.
