When comparing WCM Commander vs Worker, the Slant community recommends Worker for most people. In the question“What are the best file managers for UNIX-like systems?” Worker is ranked 21st while WCM Commander is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose Worker is:
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Built-in terminal
Has a built-in terminal from which users can run any kind of command.
Pro Virtual file system
WCM Commander has a virtual file system for smb, ftp and sftp.
Pro Built-in editor
WCM Commander has a built-in text editor with syntax highlighting included.
Pro Innumerable button-click file ops are integrated
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
Pro Remote access
Worker supports access to remote machines through various ways (ssh, ftp, rsh, http and webdav).
Pro Low system requirements
The system requirements for Worker are pretty low, making it a great option for lower-end machines. The reason why they are pretty low is because Worker is basically made of just X11 libraries.
Pro Configuration GUI
Worker has a built-in configuration GUI.
Cons
Con File editing on virtual file systems not supported
You cannot edit files in the virtual file system.