When comparing Rework vs Pleeease, the Slant community recommends Rework for most people. In the question“What are the best CSS preprocessors/postprocessors?” Rework is ranked 6th while Pleeease is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Rework is:
Through transforms you can modify existing properties to give them new attributes and options, so instead of managing messy mixins, you can add a simple new attribute where they make the most sense.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Extend native properties
Through transforms you can modify existing properties to give them new attributes and options, so instead of managing messy mixins, you can add a simple new attribute where they make the most sense.
Pro Unrestricted potential
Because Rework plugins are done in code, there are no limits to what they can do, and they tend to provide more advanced functionality that would be harder to implement in other preprocessors, such as file I/O and custom logic.
Pro Built around plugins
Rework isn't a language for compiling to CSS but rather a library around parsing it and transforming it. For example, a vendor prefix plugin will inject prefixes around needed properties so you don't have to muddy up your CSS dealing with it.
Because Rework is built around plugins at its core, it makes for easier plugin writing if you find you want to add in new functionality.
Pro Can work with other preprocessors
Although you don't have to, since Rework works on vanilla CSS, you could use another preprocessor that has a syntax you enjoy more before applying Rework's transforms.
Pro Allows for customized properties
Rework plugins can recognize custom properties and transform them via plugins. This allows you to keep your CSS clean and expand its functionality in a native feeling way, without having to learn a bunch of new language constructs.
Pro All-in-one post processor
preprocess CSS (experimental)
adds prefixes, based on Autoprefixer
provides fallbacks for rem unit, CSS3 pseudo-elements notation
adds opacity filter for IE8
converts CSS shorthand filters to SVG equivalent
packs same media-query in one @media rule
inlines @import styles
minifies the result
generates sourcemaps from pre- to postprocessors
Pro Combines media queries into single rules
If you have repeated media queries in your stylesheet, Pleeease will pack them into a single media query when compiled.
Pro Rem fallback
Rem unites are not supported in IE8 and below, so Pleeease provides a pixel fallback.
Pro Uses Autoprefixer
Pleeease uses Autoprefixer to add vendor prefixes based on which browsers you want to support (prefixes are added based on information from caniuse.com.
Cons
Con Replaced by PostCSS
Rework basically solves the same problem as the more popular PostCSS.
Con Difficult for beginners
Rework has a more involved setup that can make it an intimidating first option for beginners to css processing. As Rework is built around plugins, the documentation can't be found in one spot. The quality of documentation also varies between plugins.
Con Not very popular
Pleeease is not very popular. This may make finding guides, tutorials or resources outside the official ones difficult.