Here’s the Deal

CSS-On-Diet vs Pleeease

1 4

3 2

When comparing CSS-On-Diet vs Pleeease, the Slant community recommends Pleeease for most people. In the question“What are the best CSS preprocessors/postprocessors?” Pleeease is ranked 12th while CSS-On-Diet is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Pleeease is:

preprocess CSS (experimental) adds prefixes, based on Autoprefixer provides fallbacks for rem unit, CSS3 pseudo-elements notation adds opacity filter for IE8 converts CSS shorthand filters to SVG equivalent packs same media-query in one @media rule inlines @import styles minifies the result generates sourcemaps from pre- to postprocessors

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best CSS preprocessors/postprocessors?

CSS-On-Diet

Pleeease

Pros

Pro
Fast to read and write CSS

Works like Emmet, shorting CSS keywords, but it's not limited only to writing. Also modifying and reading COD(CSS-On-Diet) files is faster.

Pro
Easy to learn and use

Doesn't require programming skill to work with variables, mixins, media breakpoints

Pro
All-in-one post processor

preprocess CSS (experimental)
adds prefixes, based on Autoprefixer
provides fallbacks for rem unit, CSS3 pseudo-elements notation
adds opacity filter for IE8
converts CSS shorthand filters to SVG equivalent
packs same media-query in one @media rule
inlines @import styles
minifies the result
generates sourcemaps from pre- to postprocessors

Pro
Combines media queries into single rules

If you have repeated media queries in your stylesheet, Pleeease will pack them into a single media query when compiled.

Pro
Rem fallback

Rem unites are not supported in IE8 and below, so Pleeease provides a pixel fallback.

Pro
Uses Autoprefixer

Pleeease uses Autoprefixer to add vendor prefixes based on which browsers you want to support (prefixes are added based on information from caniuse.com.

Ad
Cons

Con
It's difficult adjusting to different keywords

The keywords are shortened to 3 letters. For example, "background-color" becomes "bac" and "max-width" becomes "maw". These keywords are far less intuitive than their original form and make the CSS much less readable for those who don't know CSS-On-Diet.

Con
Extremely limited adoption

CSS-On-Diet has just 7 stars on Github and a very small adoption rate. For an open source project this usually means less bugs reported, lesser documentation and few third-party learning resources.