When comparing Panono Camera vs Kodak SP360, the Slant community recommends Kodak SP360 for most people. In the question“What are the best 360-degree cameras?” Kodak SP360 is ranked 15th while Panono Camera is ranked 25th. The most important reason people chose Kodak SP360 is:
This camera is dust, shock, and freeze proof, making it an excellent device for use outdoors.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Takes completely spherical, high quality 108 MP photos
Panono uses 36 camera modules to take 108 MP photos with zero blind spots. Because Panono avoids using wide angle lenses, instead opting for a large amount of camera modules with normal lenses, the device can avoid much of the distortion that's commonly found in 360-degree cameras.
Pro Google Photosphere compatibility
Images taken with the Panono are Google Photosphere compatible. As such, they can be even used on Google Street View.
Pro You can take photos by throwing the camera in the air
This can be achieved by the accelerometer which will trigger the camera at the highest point.
Pro Fully automated stitching
Once the image files are uploaded to the cloud, they are automatically stitched within minutes. Panono provides high quality stitching and is therefore convenient for users who want to save time.
Pro Offers HDR mode
Panono Camera can capture high dynamic range photos due to HDR mode. Its settings can be enabled via the iOS or Android app.
Pro Panono apps offer a range of services
Panono has apps for Android and iOS mobile devices which allow camera settings to be changed (exposure time, ISO, White Balance). The camera can also be triggered remotely, previews can be viewed, images can be transferred to the cloud for stitching, and the user's own and other public panoramas can be viewed by pointing the mobile device in the desired viewing direction. Additional features include HDR and Anti Shake mode, while there are direct sharing options too (website embedding via iFrame, Facebook, Twitter).
Pro Water-resistant
The camera is resistant to light rain.
Pro Highly durable
This device has two shells to secure its interior while the green rubber stripes help make it more flexible in case it drops.
Pro Can be used with standard tripod screws
With the Panono tripod adapter, the camera can be mounted on a tripod and charged while it is still in use.
Pro Viewing images on a mobile device is done by pointing the device in the desired direction
Panono images can be accessed via apps for Android and iOS mobile devices and via browsers. Viewing images is achieved by pointing the mobile device in the desired viewing direction. This approach is easy to grasp by any user and no additional software is needed.
Pro Excellent durability
This camera is dust, shock, and freeze proof, making it an excellent device for use outdoors.
Pro Easy motion-detection
The user can set the camera to a motion-detection mode which allows the camera to record videos when it picks up movement. It will then stop recording if there has been no movement detected for 10 seconds. This makes for an easy set-and-forget mode which can recognize one's pets or be used for security.
Cons
Con Battery life
Between 12 - 15 images per charge (which takes 10 hours) on HDR mode.
Con Only for stills (no video)
Panono Camera is only able to capture photos, and not video footage.
Con Inefficient workflow
Connecting to the panoramic ball camera via WiFi, having to enter a password and download the preview to one's phone, then connect to a router with internet access so to upload to the cloud service (into which the user must login on their phone) to get the final stitch, is all too much work.
Con Final stitching requires an internet connection
After images are taken by Panono, an instant low-resolution and unstitched preview is sent to the companion app over WiFi. For stitching, the images must be downloaded from the camera and sent to the cloud via WiFi (USB transfer is planned). If no internet connection is available, or the service is down for whatever reason, no final stitching on images can be done.
Con 360-degree video is poor
While the camera can take decent standard 1080p30 videos, the 360-degree functionality comes at a significant cost to quality. The end result is a blurry, pixelated mess.
Con 360-degree video is circular
The camera only captures circular videos, and those that are spherical. Furthermore, captured footage includes blind spots at the top and bottom.