When comparing Vuze Camera vs Amkov AMK100S, the Slant community recommends Vuze Camera for most people. In the question“What are the best 360-degree cameras?” Vuze Camera is ranked 27th while Amkov AMK100S is ranked 30th. The most important reason people chose Vuze Camera is:
This camera uses a 4K lens, meaning that each eye in the 3D view will be 4K and will thus be high resolution.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro High video resolution
This camera uses a 4K lens, meaning that each eye in the 3D view will be 4K and will thus be high resolution.
Pro 3D video recording
Vuze Camera can record seamless panoramic 3D videos.
Pro Suitable to those who are not tech savvy
The company asserts that it will provide an all-you-need VR Kit with a VR headset, a cam, a tripod, their software, and mobile app. The stitching software should be plug & play and usable even for those who are technologically inept.
Pro Reasonably priced
At $120, this camera is much cheaper than similar models.
Pro Waterproof case (30 m)
The camera is water resistant at depths of up to 30 meters due to its waterproof housing.
Pro Substantial battery life
The 1000mAh battery lasts for about two hours while shooting 1440p30. Charging the device then takes two hours.
Cons
Con Currently unavailable
Pre-orders are available, with shipping occurring in October 2016.
Con Expensive in comparison to other 360 cameras
Though what is on offer is great (a complete 3D 4K camera with software, mounts, and a VR headset) its price is nonetheless quite high when compared to other 360 cameras. It will cost approximately $1,000. Other cameras may not be comparable in terms of features and accessories, but the price point is still quite high for those looking to get started with 360 cameras.
Con Field of view isn't correct
The camera lens is only 190x360 degrees (instead of the 220x360 claimed) and only 180x360 degrees can be viewed without distortion. This is from an in-depth review of the Amkov_AMK100S by Jan-Markus Rupprecht, which you can find here.
Con 4:3 square format leaves large black areas
Videos are 1920 x 1440 pixels and include large black areas around the circular image. Even below the circular viewing area, there are unused black areas. The effective image area is therefore only about 1.5 megapixels in videos and in photos it is around 4.5 megapixels.
Con Control LEDs on the camera not visible to user
The LEDs have a white-translucent plastic front and appear simply white in daylight, whether they are lit or not. However, the silicone sleeve shades the LEDs, usually allowing for no direct sunlight to fall on it. In addition, the viewing opening is limited only to a few degrees, so you often cannot tell whether the camera is running or not. In this case, the user must rely on the smartphone app.
Con No additional (removable) protective cover over the actual glass lens
Since the lens protrudes from the housing, you should be extremely careful during transport so not to damage the lens.
Con Watch-type remote control not available separately
While the watch remote and camera are available for purchase as a bundle on eBay (their own store), the watch remote can not currently be purchased separately.