When comparing Bounty Hunter Timeranger vs Fisher F2 , the Slant community recommends Bounty Hunter Timeranger for most people. In the question“What are the best metal detectors for beginners?” Bounty Hunter Timeranger is ranked 5th while Fisher F2 is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Bounty Hunter Timeranger is:
The shaft and coil are both watertight, making the Timeranger ideal for underwater searches.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Completely watertight
The shaft and coil are both watertight, making the Timeranger ideal for underwater searches.
Pro Thorough control panel
Timeranger has one of the most feature intensive control panels available.
Pro Detects up to 12" deep
The deepest readings provided by this machine are usually from 8" to 12" deep.
Pro Uses alpha-numeric coding system
The type of signal Timeranger receives is displayed numerically on a scale of 1-299.
Pro Monitors soil mineralization
Timeranger is constantly reading soil types, and alerts users to changes so they can rebalance the device.
Pro Very accurate readings for close objects
The discrimination feature works well for objects less than 6 inches away.
Pro Great discrimination
The F2 does a great job of separating junk from valuable finds.
Pro Excellent pinpointing feature
The built in pinpointing function works very well.