When comparing Bounty Hunter Timeranger vs Fisher F4, the Slant community recommends Fisher F4 for most people. In the question“What are the best metal detectors for beginners?” Fisher F4 is ranked 2nd while Bounty Hunter Timeranger is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose Fisher F4 is:
The F4 has an 11 category graphic ID, four tone audio identification, and a 0-99 numerical identifier.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Completely watertight
The shaft and coil are both watertight, making the Timeranger ideal for underwater searches.
Pro Thorough control panel
Timeranger has one of the most feature intensive control panels available.
Pro Detects up to 12" deep
The deepest readings provided by this machine are usually from 8" to 12" deep.
Pro Uses alpha-numeric coding system
The type of signal Timeranger receives is displayed numerically on a scale of 1-299.
Pro Monitors soil mineralization
Timeranger is constantly reading soil types, and alerts users to changes so they can rebalance the device.
Pro Very accurate readings for close objects
The discrimination feature works well for objects less than 6 inches away.
Pro Accurate object identification
The F4 has an 11 category graphic ID, four tone audio identification, and a 0-99 numerical identifier.
Pro Advanced coil
The F4 is equipped with an elliptical 11-inch DD coil.
Cons
Con Uncomfortable
The armrest padding is way too hard, and tends to get uncomfortable after a long period of use.
