When comparing Ogre3D vs Tombstone Engine, the Slant community recommends Ogre3D for most people. In the question“What are the best 3D game engines?” Ogre3D is ranked 22nd while Tombstone Engine is ranked 37th. The most important reason people chose Ogre3D is:
Direct3D 9 & 11, Metal, Vulkan, OpenGL (incl. ES2, ES3 and OGL3+) and WebGL (Emscripten) support.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Platform support
Direct3D 9 & 11, Metal, Vulkan, OpenGL (incl. ES2, ES3 and OGL3+) and WebGL (Emscripten) support.
Pro Good user community
It's been around a long time and still has a very strong user community.
Pro Complete access to high quality C++ source code
Tombstone gives full access to the clean and professional C++ source code allowing editing and upgrading anything in the system.
Pro Reliable, fast and well optimized
Pro No royalties
Pro Lots of learning resources
Including extensive documentation both in code as well as online along with a wiki, tutorials and a demo game.
Pro Extending engine's functionality is straightforward
Due to the well-organized, highly modular design of the engine adding custom functionality is easy.
Pro Full-featured and modern
Comes integrated with support for physics, audio, networking, input devices, resource management as well as modern features such as real-time shadows, horizontal mapping, voxel-based terrain, dynamic lighting, post-processing effects and much, much more.
Pro Lifetime engine updates
Pro Supportive community
Tombstone has a small, tight-knit community that's well educated and professional. Eric Lengyel, the main developer, can often be found giving thorough advice to users on the forums.