When comparing Monsters & Magic vs Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition, the Slant community recommends Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition for most people. In the question“What are the best tabletop RPGs?” Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition is ranked 16th while Monsters & Magic is ranked 42nd. The most important reason people chose Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition is:
5th Edition strikes a balance in keeping the rules simple in some areas, confusing and poorly thought out in others, while limiting the creativity of players and any real choice.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro The Effect Engine
The game uses a single core mechanic, which is flexible enough to cover a wide variety of situations. This helps GMs immensely when characters want to do things that aren't already covered in the system.
The mechanic itself works thusly: all rolls are 3d6 + modifiers minus difficulty. The result is how many effect points the player can apply to the action -- or, if negative, how many consequence points their opponent can apply to a reaction. Dealing damage is one use of effect points, but there's a limit on how much can be dealt at once, so additional effects (e.g. distracting, disarming, unmounting, etc.) see constant play instead of only being used rarely or by super-specialists. This also means failure is interesting, since it results in consequences!
This mechanic is used to do everything, and the game essentially consists of nothing but examples of how to use it.
Pro Interesting combat
Attacks generate effect points, which you spend to do things to your opponent. However, the amount of damage you can do is limited, which forces players to do other things... and the effect system is broad enough that these can be things like cutting off a carrion crawler's tentacles, knocking an opponent's sword out of their hand, and so on. Failures on attack generate consequence points as well, which your opponent can use to do things to you.
Pro Mental defense and hit points
Characters have a "Mental Defense" score and "Mental Hit Points". These are used to help provide a unified system for handling social encounters and mental attacks via magic.
Pro Minimal rules though somewhat clumsy
5th Edition strikes a balance in keeping the rules simple in some areas, confusing and poorly thought out in others, while limiting the creativity of players and any real choice.
Pro Free basic rules PDFs
Wizards of the Coast provides free PDFs containing the complete core mechanical rules of 5th Edition D&D (combat, exploration, spellcasting, etc.) and a selection of iconic character options, monsters, magic items, etc. drawn from the full game. Though short on variety, the basic rules are almost playable and accurate to the full game.
Of course far more is free in older editions as well as cheaper, 5e is by far the most expensive edition, and it is almost as bad as 4th edition.
Pro Slightly encourages character immersion
Few core aspects of 5th Edition exist solely to encourage thinking in-character, including mechanical rewards for good roleplay and detailed character backgrounds with lasting effects in the game.
Pro Bounded accuracy
Bounded Accuracy is a core design ideal of 5th Edition. In short, it means the numbers don't get too big; this lets weak challenges remain relevant for longer, and strong ones become survivable sooner. In practice, it also places more focus on a character's inherent stats and less their class or on magical equipment than has been the case in recent editions, which is a another major downside to 5e.
Pro OGL content
As with other editions of the game, much of the content is released under the Open Game License (OGL) allowing custom modification, extension and alteration of the game.
Pro Advantage rule
Rolls 2d20 chooses best. This dramatically makes all classes feel the same and moves away from distinct, interesting classes.
Pro Lacks granularity
Overuse of lazy balancing systems such as concentration spells and advantage mechanic.
This removes player choices, fun and creativity.
Pro A good mix of the best rules of the previous D&D editions without the worst things
Pro New, popular & growing
This is the most recent edition of the game and is the only one for which official content is being produced. Do not expect to see new official adventures or splatbooks published for any of the older editions of D&D.
Cons
Con Not currently available in print
Is only available in PDF.
Con Few monsters & spells provided
The included rules have only about 20 monsters and 1st and 2nd-level spells. Third party publishers have supplements that provide more, or you can use ones from old D&D.
Con Lack of granularity
Due to the simplicity of the rules, responsibility lies with the GM to govern the game rather than hard and fast rules.
Con Lacks the soul of older versions
Con It's too combat-oriented
It's meant for fight-y campaigns. Way too simple too.
Con Bland classes and races compred to other versions of DnD
Overuse of concentration mechanic, no racial stat modifiers and hardly any differences at all between races and classes, compared to previous editions.
Con Only popular because most people playing it have not tried any other systems.
Only justification for the system is to let critical role bring more people into the hobby. Once players try Warhammer, Vampire or AD&D 2e, they will have no need to return to 5e.
Con Worse mechanics than other versions of DnD
Especially spells, races and classes are dumbed down with lazy attempts to balance them, blocking player creativity.
Con Too shallow
Easy to learn, but not much to the game overall. Limited character depth and customization.
Con Very unbalanced
Thieves and Rangers are pretty much useless.
Con Casters are more powerful than noncasters
Con Almost no published material for 5e
WoTC has been super lazy since 3,5 and even that had only a third of the material available that TSR published for AD&D 2e.
Is is sad that WoTC after 7 years has not supported 5e or other versions better.
This is a great reason to look into 2e or 3,5e systems instead of 5e.