When comparing TrackDuck vs Seapine TestTrack ALM, the Slant community recommends TrackDuck for most people. In the question“What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?” TrackDuck is ranked 12th while Seapine TestTrack ALM is ranked 24th. The most important reason people chose TrackDuck is:
TrackDuck project can be integrated with more than 15 PM/chat tools: Atlassian JIRA, Basecamp, Trello, Pivotal Tracker, Teamwork, Gemini, GitHub, Redmine, Asana, Slack, HipChat, Flowdock and Intercom.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Huge list of integrations with PM/chat software
TrackDuck project can be integrated with more than 15 PM/chat tools: Atlassian JIRA, Basecamp, Trello, Pivotal Tracker, Teamwork, Gemini, GitHub, Redmine, Asana, Slack, HipChat, Flowdock and Intercom.
Pro Easy to use for non technical users
All that's required is to select a part of the website and leave a comment. TruckDuck will add information about browser, OS and screen resolution automatically.
Pro Captures technical details
TruckDuck will add information about browser, operating system and screen resolution automatically.
Pro Excellent dashboarding, burn-up/burn-down charts and a very flexible reporting tool
TestTrack ALM also supports a wide variety of filtering to help create that "ideal" report or dashboard.
Pro Fully supports export to Word of any artifact or an entire Requirements Document
Pro Supports full SCM integration
Pro Supports full Traceability
Pro Manage all product development phases and artifacts: Epic/Requirements Documents, Requirements/User Stories, Development Tasks, Test Cases, Test Runs and Issue Management.
Pro Very flexible ALM for all phases of product development
You can configure for Waterfall, Agile/Scrum, TDD, hybrid and more.
Cons
Con No integration with Zendesk
Con Steep learning curve
TestTrack ALM can be configured to just about any methodology out there. But that flexibility comes with a hefty learning curve for administration. Once learned, it's like riding a bike.