Here’s the Deal

TrackDuck vs Seapine TestTrack ALM

8 0

0 0

When comparing TrackDuck vs Seapine TestTrack ALM, the Slant community recommends TrackDuck for most people. In the question“What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?” TrackDuck is ranked 8th while Seapine TestTrack ALM is ranked 24th. The most important reason people chose TrackDuck is:

TrackDuck project can be integrated with more than 15 PM/chat tools: Atlassian JIRA, Basecamp, Trello, Pivotal Tracker, Teamwork, Gemini, GitHub, Redmine, Asana, Slack, HipChat, Flowdock and Intercom.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?

Pros

Pro
Huge list of integrations with PM/chat software

Pro
Easy to use for non technical users

All that's required is to select a part of the website and leave a comment. TruckDuck will add information about browser, OS and screen resolution automatically.

Pro
Captures technical details

TruckDuck will add information about browser, operating system and screen resolution automatically.

Pro
Excellent dashboarding, burn-up/burn-down charts and a very flexible reporting tool

TestTrack ALM also supports a wide variety of filtering to help create that "ideal" report or dashboard.

Pro
Fully supports export to Word of any artifact or an entire Requirements Document

Pro
Supports full SCM integration

Pro
Supports full Traceability

Pro
Manage all product development phases and artifacts: Epic/Requirements Documents, Requirements/User Stories, Development Tasks, Test Cases, Test Runs and Issue Management.

Pro
Very flexible ALM for all phases of product development

You can configure for Waterfall, Agile/Scrum, TDD, hybrid and more.

Ad
Cons

Con
No integration with Zendesk

Con
Steep learning curve

TestTrack ALM can be configured to just about any methodology out there. But that flexibility comes with a hefty learning curve for administration. Once learned, it's like riding a bike.