When comparing Code Climate vs ccguard, the Slant community recommends Code Climate for most people. In the question“What are the best code coverage services?” Code Climate is ranked 4th while ccguard is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose Code Climate is:
Code Climate gives you suggestions on how to improve the code which you can catalog on Jira.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Gives code improvement suggestions
Code Climate gives you suggestions on how to improve the code which you can catalog on Jira.
Pro Integration with team chat software
Code Climate directly integrates with team chat tools like Slack or HipChat.
Pro Shows test code coverage
Code Climate is fully integrated with test coverage statistics and metrics, giving you a complete view and understanding of them.
Pro Free for open source
Code Climate is completely free for open source projects.
Pro Your own server, your intellectual property
You don't trust a third party service to host your IP? Host your own server, at no cost (every cloud provider will host your server freely for the first year).
Pro Open source
Pro Distributed references
The code coverage "references" are the previous measurements of code coverage. These references are distributed: all the team members can share the references in the same way they share the source code.
Cons
Con Mostly for web development languages
Code Climate only supports web development projects at the moment. Or at least languages that are widely used in web development (JavaScript, Ruby, Python and PHP). It has no support for largely used languages like Java or C++.
Con Repository token must be set manually for open source projects
The other services tend to automatically integrate with CI services like Travis, but Code Climate requires you to copy your repo's token into your CI service's environment.
Con Web interface doesn't show hits per line
Most code coverage services show both what lines of code were run and how many times each line was run, but Code Climate only shows the former.
Con Not really user friendly
There is little/no graphical user interface. Everything is done via command line instructions.