When comparing Skedool.it vs Assistant.to, the Slant community recommends Skedool.it for most people. In the question“What are the best digital scheduling assistants?” Skedool.it is ranked 3rd while Assistant.to is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose Skedool.it is:
Due to humans supervising all Alex's communications and being able to step in at any time, there's little worry that communication between Alex and the other party will go bad.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Reliable
Due to humans supervising all Alex's communications and being able to step in at any time, there's little worry that communication between Alex and the other party will go bad.
Pro Human-like interaction
The digital assistant is personified as Alex. When an email suggesting a meeting is cc'd to him, he will interact with the other party using natural language and try to not only set up the meeting, but negotiate preferable time, type and location.
Pro No software to download
No app or plugin to download. All that's needed is to share calendar with alex@skedool.it and provide Alex with meeting preferences. Alex can now be cc'ed whenever a meeting needs to be scheduled. He will hash out the details of the meeting based on set preferences.
Pro Works with any email client
Since you interact with Alex over email, all you need is an email client to get started. It works with Gmail, Outlook, and all other email clients.
Pro Works via an easy to use Chrome plugin
The Chrome plugin integrates with Gmail webapp and Google calendar. It shows a bar at the bottom of the email and allows setting meeting length, location and available times and embeds that information in the email. The recipient then chooses from available options and both parties receive an invite.
Pro Manages time zones
Times are presented for each party in their appropriate time zone.
Cons
Con No group scheduling
Allows scheduling only one-on-one meetings.
Con Chrome, Gmail and Google calendar only
While the recipient can use any e-mail, calendar and browser combination, the organizer has to use Google's products.