x.ai vs Assistant.to
When comparing x.ai vs Assistant.to, the Slant community recommends x.ai for most people. In the question“What are the best digital scheduling assistants?” x.ai is ranked 2nd while Assistant.to is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose x.ai is:
Amy learns preferences in meeting times, types, density and places from calendar history and interactions with other people. She event takes into account social dynamics, outliers, exceptions, travel time and each participant's known preferences in order to maximize everyone's happiness. As she has more and more data to work with, she can arrange more preferable meetings.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Takes into account intricate preferences and learns over time
Amy learns preferences in meeting times, types, density and places from calendar history and interactions with other people. She event takes into account social dynamics, outliers, exceptions, travel time and each participant's known preferences in order to maximize everyone's happiness. As she has more and more data to work with, she can arrange more preferable meetings.
Pro Human-like interaction
The digital assistant is personified as Amy. When an email suggesting a meeting is cc'd to her, she will interact with the other party using natural language and try to not only set up the meeting, but negotiate preferable time, type and location.
Pro No software to download
No app or plugin to download. All that's needed is giving Amy access to calendar and cc'ing her whenever a meeting has to be scheduled.
Pro No preferences to set
Amy learns preferences in meeting times, types, density and places from calendar history and interactions with other people. It's also possible to send certain instructions directly to her.
Pro Works via an easy to use Chrome plugin
The Chrome plugin integrates with Gmail webapp and Google calendar. It shows a bar at the bottom of the email and allows setting meeting length, location and available times and embeds that information in the email. The recipient then chooses from available options and both parties receive an invite.
Pro Manages time zones
Times are presented for each party in their appropriate time zone.
Cons
Con Scheduling currently is limited to 5 people
Group scheduling currently is limited to 5 people.
Con No group scheduling
Allows scheduling only one-on-one meetings.
Con Chrome, Gmail and Google calendar only
While the recipient can use any e-mail, calendar and browser combination, the organizer has to use Google's products.