When comparing Nature's Zombie Apocalypse vs Worms Armageddon, the Slant community recommends Worms Armageddon for most people. In the question“What are the best local co-op PC games?” Worms Armageddon is ranked 24th while Nature's Zombie Apocalypse is ranked 88th. The most important reason people chose Worms Armageddon is:
Up to 6 teams, each with up to 8 worms can be present in the game.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Barrel of laughs with a group of friends sat on the couch
Pro Up to 8 player local co-op supported
I don't know who has 8 controllers, but that will surely be crazy.
Pro Kid friendly mode
It has the option to turn off all blood, making it a lot more kid friendly.
Pro Each character has it's own unique move
Each animal has it's own rage move which is pretty awesome
Pro Allows for large multiplayer battles
Up to 6 teams, each with up to 8 worms can be present in the game.
Pro Easily practice in single player
Upon Armageddons release this was the first Worms title to have a single player campaign. This allows for a great way to practice before going online to play, which can be difficult due to being matched with players with a higher skill level.
Pro Easy to access multiplayer
Due to Worms Armageddons integrated Worms.net server the multiplayer is simple to join making for an intuitive online experience.
Cons
Con No campaign, just different modes to play
There's no real campaign for the game yet, but it is still in early access, so hopefully something will be added.
Con Single player puzzles are frustrating
Many of the single player campaigns are difficult due to frustrating puzzles that can take many tries to complete. As much as it is nice to have a single player campaign the real meat of the game is meant to be in the multiplayer, which shows in the design of these single player missions.