When comparing Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 vs Battlefield 4, the Slant community recommends Battlefield 4 for most people. In the question“What are the best LAN party PC games?” Battlefield 4 is ranked 59th while Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 is ranked 61st. The most important reason people chose Battlefield 4 is:
Each level in the multiplayer section of the game has fully destructible elements, meaning that a certain area of a level can be opened up to new tactics due to a missing structure. This keeps the strategy of each game fully immersive as things can change on the fly.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Shooting works well on mouse keyboard or gamepad
Shotting in the game works quite well with either a mouse and keyboard or a gamepad.
Pro Cryengine 3
Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 was designed in Cryengine 3, meaning the game itself looks fantastic.
Pro Immersive destruction that can change gameplay
Each level in the multiplayer section of the game has fully destructible elements, meaning that a certain area of a level can be opened up to new tactics due to a missing structure. This keeps the strategy of each game fully immersive as things can change on the fly.
Pro 64 Players Mode
Cons
Con Very scripted
Playing through the game often feels very inflexible, often pulling the player out of the immersion as doing something that makes sense, such as taking an enemy's weapon is not allowed when the story does not deem it appropriate to further itself along.
Con Short campaign
The campaign in Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 is pretty short coming in at around 4 hours total.
Con Poor writing in campaign mode
The story in the campaign mode is pretty lacking and never fully fleshes out the characters contained within. It can be difficult to care about what is going on, which is a disappointment as there is little reason to continue forward as far as the story is concerned.