When comparing Rackspace Cloud Files vs Aerobatic, the Slant community recommends Aerobatic for most people. In the question“What are the best website hosting providers?” Aerobatic is ranked 14th while Rackspace Cloud Files is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose Aerobatic is:
Create your own 404 error pages.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports custom domains
Rackspace has support for custom domains for static websites hosted on their servers.
Pro Custom error pages
Create your own 404 error pages.
Pro Custom domains
Includes self-renewing wildcard SSL certificate
Pro Password protection
Pro Multiple deploy stages
Easily deploy to a preview instance with a unique URL
Pro Versioning
Each push creates a new version of your site. Aerobatic maintains up to 50 previous versions of your site, all accessible from the own unique URL.
Pro Deploy alerts
Pro API Proxy
Helpful for calling APIs that are not CORS enabled. Also allows injection of environment variables to keep secrets out of the client-side code.
Pro Free Tier
Pro Bitbucket integration
Edit your code, push your changes, and your site is live automatically (fast).
Cons
Con No redirect support
Over time, some pages will be renamed and others deleted. To avoid broken links, redirects are used. Unfortunately Rackspace does not support them.
Con No FTP access
Doesn't provide FTP access to upload files or edit the database on the go.