Here’s the Deal

Bluehost vs Google Firebase

7 9

62 29

When comparing Bluehost vs Google Firebase, the Slant community recommends Google Firebase for most people. In the question“What are the best website hosting providers?” Google Firebase is ranked 8th while Bluehost is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Google Firebase is:

The Blaze Plan is a pay-as-you-go plan, which is, you pay for what you use, without overhead or upfront costs.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best website hosting providers?

Pros

Pro
Recommended by Wordpress.org

Pro
Flexible Pricing

The Blaze Plan is a pay-as-you-go plan, which is, you pay for what you use, without overhead or upfront costs.

Pro
Straightforward hosting

Powered by Google's Cloud Platform, Firebase allows you to deploy static web pages or web applications with a nifty Node.js-based CLI Tool.

Pro
Super fast CDN

All static website content is hosted on the Fastly CDN making your website really fast.

Pro
More than just hosting web applications

In the core of Firebase allows you to do testing for Android apps, Analytics, Real-time Database, and many more. It's centered mostly for progressive web applications and mobile applications with real-time connectivity to your service.

Pro
Almost free if you add Cloudflare in front (no bandwidth costs) and cache effectively

The built-in CDN is great too, but if you're concerned about bandwidth costs, using it with Cloudflare is an excellent option option.

Ad
Cons

Con
Has Been Hacked

BlueHost has suffered security breaches before and was hacked by the Syrian Electronic Army in 2015, along with other EIG-owned hosts.

Con
Owned by EIG

Endurance International Group (EIG) is notorious for buying out web hosts and customers often notice a drop in quality and support. They also own BlueHost.