Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Bluehost vs Aerobatic, the Slant community recommends Aerobatic for most people. In the question“What are the best website hosting providers?” Aerobatic is ranked 14th while Bluehost is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Aerobatic is:
Includes self-renewing wildcard SSL certificate
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Recommended by Wordpress.org
Pro Custom domains
Includes self-renewing wildcard SSL certificate
Pro Custom error pages
Create your own 404 error pages.
Pro Password protection
Pro Multiple deploy stages
Easily deploy to a preview instance with a unique URL
Pro Versioning
Each push creates a new version of your site. Aerobatic maintains up to 50 previous versions of your site, all accessible from the own unique URL.
Pro Deploy alerts
Pro API Proxy
Helpful for calling APIs that are not CORS enabled. Also allows injection of environment variables to keep secrets out of the client-side code.
Pro Free Tier
Pro Bitbucket integration
Edit your code, push your changes, and your site is live automatically (fast).
Cons
Con Has Been Hacked
BlueHost has suffered security breaches before and was hacked by the Syrian Electronic Army in 2015, along with other EIG-owned hosts.
Con Owned by EIG
Endurance International Group (EIG) is notorious for buying out web hosts and customers often notice a drop in quality and support. They also own BlueHost.
Con Censorship
BlueHost has been under fire in the past for censoring web pages for controversial people.
Con No FTP access
Doesn't provide FTP access to upload files or edit the database on the go.
