When comparing Moqups vs UXPin, the Slant community recommends Moqups for most people. In the question“What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?” Moqups is ranked 1st while UXPin is ranked 31st. The most important reason people chose Moqups is:
Moqups is built in HTML5 and standard Javascript, so it doesn't require any plugins to use. The application is very fast to use.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast and doesn't require any plugins
Moqups is built in HTML5 and standard Javascript, so it doesn't require any plugins to use. The application is very fast to use.
Pro Supports 960gs
As well as a standard snap-to-grid, Moqups supports the 960 gridsystem.
Pro Free tier
The Free Plan offers 2 active projects with at most 300 stencils each and 5 MB of storage. This plan does not include: Master Pages, Real Time Collaboration, Privacy Settings, Unlimited Revisions, Unlimited Project Archiving and Teams.
Pro Clean design and very intuitive
Pro Keyboard shortcuts
Moqups has an extensive list of keyboard shortcuts. Simply type some A-Z letters to search for components. F1 for an overlay help screen.
Pro Modern Material elements
Pro Free upgrades for nonprofit/education
Pro UXPin has great advanced features for prototyping
integration if this then dop that and custom javascript functionality
Pro Actively developed
UXPin is constantly being updated with new features.
Pro Import from PhotoShop and Sketch
A pro UXPin account will allow you to import existing projects from PhotoShop or Sketch.
Pro Extensive library of elements and patterns
UXPin offers elements from a wide range libraries. This includes responsive frameworks such as Bootstrap and Foundation, and libraries specific to mobile prototyping.
Cons
Con Expensive subscription model
$29 per user/mo ($350 pa) will soon rack up compared to a standalone product like Axure PRO ($450) which has a license that lasts years (they have given out free updates for the last 2 versions).
Con Steep learning curve
UXPin is one of the more complex prototyping tools. Combined with a lack of documentation, it can be discouraging for first time users.
