When comparing Moqups vs Precursor, the Slant community recommends Moqups for most people. In the question“What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?” Moqups is ranked 1st while Precursor is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Moqups is:
Moqups is built in HTML5 and standard Javascript, so it doesn't require any plugins to use. The application is very fast to use.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast and doesn't require any plugins
Moqups is built in HTML5 and standard Javascript, so it doesn't require any plugins to use. The application is very fast to use.
Pro Supports 960gs
As well as a standard snap-to-grid, Moqups supports the 960 gridsystem.
Pro Free tier
The Free Plan offers 2 active projects with at most 300 stencils each and 5 MB of storage. This plan does not include: Master Pages, Real Time Collaboration, Privacy Settings, Unlimited Revisions, Unlimited Project Archiving and Teams.
Pro Clean design and very intuitive
Pro Keyboard shortcuts
Moqups has an extensive list of keyboard shortcuts. Simply type some A-Z letters to search for components. F1 for an overlay help screen.
Pro Modern Material elements
Pro Free upgrades for nonprofit/education
Pro Free tier
A free tier with all mockup functionality is available. Free tier is limited by lacking ability to save mockups privately and additional services provided by Precursor like voice chat and registered subdomains.
Pro Collaborate in real time
Share a link with teammates and they can jump right into your doc. You'll see their changes as they happen, and the built-in voice chat makes design meetings effortless.
Pro Highly polished UX
Cons
Con Really simplistic
Basic tools (line, square, circle) wich do no stick together: if you move a circle the attached line won't move making reengineering the model simply impossible